CCST Releases Report on Expanding Biofuels in California
Advanced biofuels have the potential to provide California with economic opportunities while
reducing greenhouse gas emissions consistent with the state's climate and clean air policies.
However, the state may not have sufficient incentives in place to attract the private investment to
rapidly scale up production, according to a new report by the California Council on Science and
"Policies for California's Energy Future - Scaling Up Advanced Biofuels"
is the second report in a series which analyzes how California can effectively construct a policy framework to help the state meet its ambitious greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction goals over the coming years. The California's Energy Future - Policy (CEF-P) project follows on CCST's landmark
California's Energy Future
study, which explored the technical feasibility of California reducing its GHG emissions to 80%
below 1990 levels by 2050 while still accommodating projected growth in its economy and
"California's policy framework is already ahead of the rest of the country in terms of
encouraging the development of low carbon biofuels," said Bob Epstein, co-founder of E2 and Sybase
and chairman of the NRDC Action Fund, one of the authors of the report. "It is the only framework
that encourages maximum carbon reduction. However, low-carbon biofuels overall are at a relatively
early stage of production, and policy changes can accelerate development and use of these
Biofuels are fuels that can replace gasoline or diesel and are produced from natural resources, such as agricultural wastes, forest thinnings and harvest residues, municipal wastes, and purpose-grown energy crops such as perennial grasses and short rotation woody crops. In May 2013, CCST released an
analysis of the potential role biofuels could play in to
contribute to meeting the energy needs of California, particularly for transportation. The new
report focuses on the private capital needed to scale up low-carbon biofuels and explores policies
that the state could implement to encourage wider production and use of low-carbon biofuels.
"The capital for production facilities isn't there yet," said Epstein. "The state is essentially
creating a new market for low-carbon fuels. California is already exceeding its current targets for
implementing reduced carbon fuels as part of the LCFS. California need to evaluate how to accelerate
production in order to meet long-term goals."
Potential economic benefits of expanding the state's nascent biofuels market include increases in
jobs, increased tax revenue, reduction of waste disposal in landfills, and improved air quality. In
order to attract private capital and give investors a clearer sense of potential economic returns,
the report explores three principal policy changes:
- Establishing a floor on low carbon fuel standard (LCFS) credits, which would allow the market to
calculate a known minimum return on investment;
- Expanding the trading market, adding to the number of participants which can buy and sell LCFS credits; and
- Allowing obligated parties an "alternative compliance" to purchasing allowances (beginning in
2015) by investing in "qualified" projects that result in the development and use of new
transportation fuels and technologies in California.
As the report notes, California is in a unique position to capitalize on and expand an already
effective policy framework to establish a more viable biofuels industry in the state.
"California has the potential for significant economic development through these incentives,"
said Epstein. "This report suggests ways to modify state policies to allow the state to maximize
this potential, and facilitate its planned emissions reductions over the coming decades."