CCST Releases Summary of Meetings on Trust and Accountability

January 13, 2011 |   | Contact: M. Daniel DeCillis

The October 2010 CCST Council meeting focused on trust and accountability in science and technology. Two summary documents are now available, with overviews of the discussions from October 18 and 19, respectively.

“Issues of trust and accountability in science are both timely and long-standing,” CCST Past Chair Charles Kennel said in his opening remarks at the meeting. “It shouldn’t come as a surprise that scientific authority is subject to questioning by the larger society, but when that authority is undermined – as illustrated by the ‘Climategate’ scandal in 2009 – overall trust in scientific methods and recommendations can falter as well.”

The meeting on October 18 focused on the role CCST should take with regards to the erosion of public trust in science and ways to address both real and perceived lapses in scientific accountability. CCST was created as an independent, impartial organization by the Legislature to advise the state on policy matters relating to science and technology.

The meeting on the 19th focused on broader issues, including:

  • Scoping the issues of trust and accountability,
  • What modeling of complex systems – from climate change to engineering to public education pipelines – can and cannot tell us,
  • The science of trust (as illustrated by a neuroscientist’s research on oxycotin), and
  • From the cosmos to the legislative chamber – highlights from the experiences of CCST’s first cohort of science and technology fellows completing a year in various legislative offices in Sacramento.

The documents provide detailed summaries of presentations from both days, along with comments and questions from other meeting participants. A list of participants and a brief list of resources and background papers are provided in appendices.

Among other things, it is important to find better ways to structure real dialogue between scientists, decision makers, and the public, said Kennel, in order to counter the undermining of public trust in recent years.

“The scientific community,” he said, “has a responsibility to understand how conflicts happened, and how to move forward.”


Updated with corrected version of Summaries from Day 2 at 6pm 1/13/11.

Recent Posts

REGISTER: Life as a CCST Fellow: What’s It Like? | Application Q&A
A graphic with blue background, white and yellow text, and circle cropped headshots of the panelists
CCST S&T Policy Fellowship Alums to Discuss the Day-to-Day Life of a Fellow Learn about ...
Director of Communications at the California Council on Science and Technology (CCST)
CCST logo with blue border around it and careers in white text on orange background
OVERVIEW We are a nonpartisan group delivering independent science and technology advice to policymakers so ...
Update: Opportunities Open at CCST
Work at CCST California’s most pressing public policy issues require solutions that engage the State’s ...
Assessing Climate Risk – My Fellowship Year: Like An ‘Inverted Delta’
A photo of Kara Voss, PhD, a 2022 CCST Science & Technology Policy Fellow with the title of her blog post and CCST logo on a blue background
Kara Voss, PhD, is a 2022 CCST Science & Technology Policy Fellow placed with the ...